ادبیات پسااستعماری، مادیت و غیاب رادیکال: جستاری درباره فرودست‌سازی اشیاء

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار گروه جامعه‌شناسی، دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

این مقاله در تلاش است تا مفهوم اشیا فرودست را در تقاطع مادیت وغیاب بسط دهد. برای انجام این کار نقد ادبی منتسب به دریدا در ادبیات پسااستعماری در جهت بازخوانی انتقادی انسان‌شناسی استعماری و بالاخص کار ای.بی.تیلور به کار گرفته شده. در این بازخوانی نشان داده می شود چگونه جنبه‌های خاصی از زیست‌بوم به دلیل ناتوانی در ارائه ردی از گذشته خود فرودست‌سازی می‌شود و از کنش به‌مثابه عامل زمانمندسازی منع میگردد. فرایند فرودست‌سازی زیست‌بوم مبتنی بر اشیا فناورانه و رابطه‌ی پیشرونده‌ این اشیا با گذشته‌ خود است که ساختار زمانی خطی مدرن ما را میسازد. یعنی حرکت از معدود اشیاء فناورانه ساده به انبوهی فزاینده از اشیاء فن‌آورانه پیچیده که پیشرفت-به‌مثابه-تاریخ را تولید می کند. این مقاله با تاکید بر مفهوم غیاب رادیکال به عنوان نقطه عزیمت یک سیاست-حیات رهایی‌بخش به پایان می‌رسد و می‌پرسد: چه نوع همکاری با اشیا فرودست (زیست‌بوم) میتواند ایده آلترناتیو «پیشرفت-توسعه» و ساختار زمانی خطی مدرن مرتبط با آن را ممکن کند؟

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Post-Colonial Studies, Materiality, and Radical Absence: An Essay on Subaltern Objects

نویسنده [English]

  • Kosha Gorji Sefat
چکیده [English]

Positioned at the wave-crest of material disappearances and the foreclosure of corresponding modes of thought, this essay develops the notion of subaltern objects at the intersection of materiality and absence. In doing so, the essay illustrates how two projects of epistemic overhaul working as dislocated and unacknowledged parts of a vast two-handed engine within Europe and on the colonial frontier subalternized facets of that bio-habitat that did not retain a mark of their past, impeding them from acting as agents of temporalization within our modern linear temporal structures. The essay argues that such linear structures are partly centered on the succession of technological objects and their “development,” one out of another, in a chronological order (e.g., from print to electronic to digital mediums). That is, a movement from few simple to increasingly more complex technological objects that establishes progress-as-history. The essay concludes by considering what a politics of radical absences might mean and how it could be linked to an alternative schema to progress/development.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Post-colonialsm
  • temporality
  • radical absence
  • materiality
  • subaltern objects
  • literary critique

مراجع

  1. گرجی‌صفت، کوشا (۱۴۰۰). گفتمان انقالبی اشیاء: گذار از چرخش فرهنگی به چرخش مادی. فصلنامۀ مطالعات فرهنگی و ارتباطات، ۱۷(۶۲)، ۲۷۳-۳۰۸.
  2. گرجی‌صفت، کوشا (۱۴۰۱). سیاست اشیای جهانی در ایران پساجنگ. فصلنامۀ مطالعات و تحقیقات اجتماعی در ایران، ۱۱(۴۲)، ۲۷۳-۳۰۳.
  3. Adorno, T. )2015(. Negative Dialectics. London: Routledge.
  4. Althusser, L. )2006(. Philosophy of the Encounter: Later Writings, 1978-1987. Edited by Olver Corpet and Francois Matheron, Translated by G. M. Goshgarian, New York: Verso.
  5. Bataille, G. (1990). Hegel, Death and Sacrifice. Yale French Studies, 78, 9-28.
  6. Butler, J. E. Laclau and S. Zizek. (2000). Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. London: Verso Press.
  7. Butler, J. (2011). Bodies That Matter. New York: Routledge.
  8. Butler, J. (2022). Laclau, Marx, and the Performative Power of Negation. Verso. January 6, 2020. https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/5238-judith-butler-laclau-marx-and-the-performative-power-ofnegation
  9. Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  10. Derrida, J. (1981). Writing and Difference. London: Routledge.
  11. Fanon, F. (2008). Black Skin White Masks. Translated by C. L. Markmann, New York: Pluto Press.
  12. Fowles, S. (2010). People without Things. In An Anthropology of Absence: Materializations of Trancendence and Loss, edited by Mikkel Bille, Frida Hastrup, Tim Flohr Sorensen, London: Springer 23-45.
  13. Gell, A. (1998). Art and Agency: A new Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University
  14.  
  15. Guha, R. (1988). The Prose of Counter-insurgency, in R. Guha and G.C. Spivak (eds.) Selected Subaltern Studies. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 45-86.
  16. Guha, R. (2002). History at the Limit of World-History. New York: Columbia University Press.
  17. Hastrup, F. (2010). Materializations of Disaster: Recovering Lost Plats in a Tsunami-Affected Village in South India. In An Anthropology of Absence: Materializations of Trancendence and Loss, edited by Mikkel Bille, Frida Hastrup, Tim Flohr Sorensen, London: Springer 99-115.
  18. Hegel, G. W. F. (1997). The Difference between Fichte’s and Schelling’s System of Philosophy: An English Translation. Translated by W. Cerf and H.S. Harris. New York: State University of New York Press.
  19. Ingold, T. (1992). Culture and the Perception of the Environment. In Bush Base, Forest Farm: Culture, Environment and Development, edited by Elizabeth Croll and David Parkin, 39-56. London: Routledge.
  20. Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.
  21. Ingold, T. (2011). Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  22. Ingold, T. (2018). Back to the Future with the Theory of Affordances. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 8(1/2), 39-44.
  23. Jensen, A. (2010). A Sense of Absence: The Staging of Heroic Deaths and Ongoing Lives Among American Organ Donor Families. In An Anthropology of Absence: Materializations of Trancendence and Loss, edited by Mikkel Bille, Frida Hastrup, Tim Flohr Sorensen, London: Springer 63-83.
  24. Keane, W. (2018). Perspectives on Affordances, Or the Anthropologically Real. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 8(1/2), 27-38.
  25. Kohn, E. (2013). How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human. Berekley: University of California Press.
  26. Latour, B. (1991). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  27. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  28. Latour, B. (2004). Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  29. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  30. Latour, B. (2018). Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime. London: Wiley.
  31. Miller, D. (2005). Materiality: An Introduction. In Materiality, edited by Daniel Miller, Durham: Duke University Press, 1-50.
  32. Peirce, C. (1998). The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings. Vol. 2 (1893-1913). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  33. Peirce, C. (1992). The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings. Vol. 1. Bloomington: Indian University Press.
  34. Prakash, G. (ed.). (1995). After Colonialism: Imperial Histories and Postcolonial Displacement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  35. Renshaw, L. (2010). Missing Bodies Near-at-Hand: The Dissonant Memory and Dormant Graves of the Spanish Civil War. In An Anthropology of Absence: Materializations of Trancendence and Loss, edited by Mikkel Bille, Frida Hastrup, Tim Flohr Sorensen, London: Springer, 45-63.
  36. Santos, B.S. (2001). Nuestra America: Reinventing a Subaltern Paradigm of Recognition and Redisribution. Theory, Culture and Society, 18, 185-216.
  37. Santos, B.S. (2006). Globalization. Theory, Culture and Society, 23, 393-399.
  38. Sefat, K. (2019). The End of Romanticism in Tehran. Michigan Quarterly Review, 58(2), 1-16.
  39. Sefat, K. 2020. Things and Terms: Relations Between Materiality, Language, and Politics in Post-Revolutionary Iran. International Political Sociology, 14(2), 175-195.
  40. Spinoza, B. (2016). A Political Treaties: Tractatus Politicus. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
  41. Spinoza, B. (2005). Ethics. London: Penguin.
  42. Spivak, G.C. (1985). Can the Subaltern Speak? Speculations on Widow Sacrifice. Wedge, 7(8), 120-130.
  43. Stengers, I. (1997). Cosmopolitiques 7: Pour en finer avec la tolerance. Paris: La decouverte, Les Empecheurs de Penser en Rond.
  44. Thompson, J. B. (1990). Ideology and Modern Culture: Critical Social Theory in the Era of Mass Communication. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  45. Tylor, E. B. ([1873] 2010). Primitive Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  46. Watson, M.C. (2011). Cosmopolitics and the Subaltern: Problematizing Latour’s Idea of the Commons. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(3), 55-79.
جامعه شناسی هنر و ادبیات
دوره 14، شماره 1
دوره 14. شماره 1. بهار و تابستان 1401
شهریور 1401
صفحه 41-57

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار