Qualitative study of the relationship between constructing creativity and fluidity of music genres; A case study of genre changes and innovation in the culture of Iranian classical music production

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Social Communication, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran

Abstract

In this article, we studied the fluidity in the division of the Iranian classical music genre related to the meaning of creativity as a "cultural process". Through a semi-structured interview with 5 musicians in the Iranian classical music genre, we analyzed how the relationship between creating creativity in the "production culture" of the Iranian music industry and the division of the Iranian classical genre. According to the results, the main themes are "celebrity-oriented creativity", which creates quasi-Dastgahi, Composite music and custom-organizational music, "pure creativity", which creates the artistic genre, and "cultural creativity", which is the original Dastgahi genre, and Creates social art. In each context, the moral and ritual codes and the position of the audience and the profit are different. Ethical and ritual codes in the context of cultural are related to moral preconditions such as modesty and rituals. The relationship with the vertical audience and in order to promote the audience's listening taste and financial gain in it is futuristic. In pure creativity, moral and ritual codes are not prominent, the audience is absent and the real creator himself is present in this genre. The reputation-oriented genre begins with the audience's perception, there is a sense of artist alienation in the genre, it is followed by rapid financial consequentialism, and the moral and ritual codes are based on technical ostentation.

Keywords


  1. خاکساری، علی (۱۳۸۸). «رفرماسیون موسیقایی، بررسی و نقد «"موسیقی سنتی ایران» " با رویکردی به «سنت موسیقایی ایرانی» در دوره معاصر»، جامعه شناسیجامعه‌شناسی هنر و ادبیات، سال اول، صصص ۱۵۹ تا۱۷۶176-159.
  2. سالدنا، جانی (1395)، ). راهنمای کدگذاری برای پژوهشگران کیفی ،. عبدالله گیویان، تهران: انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
  3. سرایی، پویا (۱۳۹۴) « طرح مدلی سه‌گانه از نقش‌پذیری موسیقی‌دانان در جامعة‌ معاصر موسیقی ایران»، ماهنامه گزارش موسیقی، پیاپی ۷۷ ، صص۳۴-۳۵ 35-34.
  4. شفرد، جان (1390). موسیقی به‌مثابة متن اجتماعی، ( ترجمه جمال محمدی)، چاپ اول، تهران: ‌دفتر پژوهش های رادیو، 1390.
  5. طلایی، داریوش (۱۳۷۸).«ردیف وسیستم مقام­ها»، نشریه هنر، شماره ۴۲، صص ۱۲۱-۱۴۵
  6. فیلیک، اووه ( 1387) .درآمدی بر تحقیق کیفی، . (ترجمه هادی جلیلی)، چاپ دوم، تهران : نشر نی.
  7. کیانی، مجید (۱۳۹۳) هفت دستگاه، تهران: سوره مهر
  8. هال، استوارت و دیگران ( 1388). درباره مطالعات فرهنگی،(. ترجمه جمال محمدی)، تهران: نشر چشمه.
  9. هینیک، ناتالی (1384)، جامعه‌شناسی هنر(. ترجمه عبدالحسین نیک گهر)، تهران: نشر آگه.
    1. Hesmondhalgh, David (2007), Cultural industries,2nd edition, London, Sage Publication
    2. Hesmondhalgh, David (2011),” Towards A Political Aesthetics of Music”, Wiley-Blackwell.”, The Cultural Study of Music: A Critical Introduction, edited by Martin Clayton, et al., Routledge.
    3. Hesmondhalgh, David, Baker, Sarah (2010),” A very complicated version of freedom’:Conditions and experiences of creative labour in three cultural industries“,Poetics 38 ,4–20
    4. Haynes, Jo, Marshall, Lee, (2018),” Reluctant Entrepreneurs: Musicians and Entrepreneurship in the ‘New’ Music Industry”, British Journal of Sociology, 69(2), 459-482.
    5. Morat, Daniel (2014), Sounds of Modern History, Auditory Cultures in 19th- and 20th-Century Europe, Berghahn Books
    6. Negus, Keith (1999),Music Genres and Corporate Cultures, London and New York: Routledge

16. Toynbee, Jason (2011),” Music, Culture, and Creativity”, Wiley-Blackwell.”, The Cultural Study of Music: A Critical Introduction, edited by Martin Clayton, et al., Routledge.